National Survey Finds Voters’ Views in Line With Airlines for America’s continued Opposition on Behalf of our Passengers to a Near Doubling of the Airport Tax
WASHINGTON, March 3, 2015 – Airlines for America (A4A), the industry trade organization for the leading U.S. airlines, today released the findings of a nationwide survey showing voters overwhelmingly oppose an increase in the Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) – also known as the Airport Tax. The survey of 1,000 registered voters, conducted by The Tarrance Group, found 82 percent of voters oppose almost doubling the PFC and tying future automatic increases to inflation. Additionally, voters also understand airports have the resources they need to fund projects and believe air travelers are already taxed enough.
The survey results are being released as a growing chorus of airlines, industry stakeholders, anti-tax advocates, organized labor and consumer groups voice their opposition to airports’ attempts to raise the cap on the PFC.
“The lack of a crisis in airport funding hasn’t prevented some from trying to invent one,” said A4A President and CEO Nicholas E. Calio. “Since 2008, over $70 billion of airport capital projects have been completed, are underway or are approved by U.S. airlines and their airport partners at the nation’s largest 30 airports. Voters correctly believe that airports have plenty, yet passengers are taxed enough.”
As part of its continued efforts to oppose additional taxes on passengers, A4A will be unveiling a series of ads demonstrating that an increase in the Airport Tax is neither wanted nor needed. One ad focuses on the airport lobby’s attempt to disguise the fact that hiking the current PFC cap is a tax increase, regardless of how they brand it.
Key findings from the survey include:
- Voters View the PFC as a Tax, not a User Fee. A strong majority of voters – 65 percent – view the PFC as a tax because every flyer must pay it.
- Voters Say Passengers Are Already Taxed Enough. After learning that air travelers currently pay $63 in taxes on a typical domestic $300 round-trip ticket, 81 percent of voters are less likely to support an increase in the PFC.
- Voters Know Airports are Well-Funded. When informed that airports have investment-grade credit, are financially sound, have ample access to the bond market to raise money and currently hold more than $11 billion dollars in unrestricted cash, 75 percent of voters are less likely to support a PFC increase.
- Voters Understand Airports Have the Resources to Fund Projects. Since 2008, over $70 billion of airport capital projects have been completed, are underway or are approved by U.S. airlines and their airport partners at the nation’s largest 30 airports without any increases in the PFC – a fact that makes a full 65 percent of voters less likely to support an increase.
- Voters Believe Improving Roads and Bridges Should be a Priority Over Airports. Given the choice between improving airport facilities or improving roads and bridges, voters overwhelmingly support funding improvements to roads and bridges. An overwhelming majority of voters – 89 percent – select roads and bridges while just 6 percent select airports.
Excerpts from the survey can be found here.
“Recent Congresses—under Democratic and Republican control—have held the line on a PFC increase,” Calio concluded. “They did so because passengers, airlines and the U.S. economy cannot afford higher taxes and fees, and because airports are capable of addressing capital needs through existing revenue streams. The same is true today, if not more so.”
Airlines for America (A4A) advocates on behalf of the leading U.S. airlines, both passenger and cargo carriers. A4A works collaboratively with industry stakeholders, federal agencies, the Administration, Congress, labor and other groups to improve aviation for the traveling and shipping public.